Dear Samhain....

It had been some centuries ago when the aera of zombies started.

No one clearly knows how it all began, no wonder if you know how zombies are, they are not the brightest match in the box. Mostly they care just about filling their bellies with tasty human meat.
If it concerns anything else, their mental capacity is quite lacking.

But there are some theories, most can be taken aside as nonsense.

Like the one about humans multiplied so much that they started cannibalism again and somehow a part of humanity turned into zombity.
Or that it was the next step of evolution...
Or that human was the only animal on the planet that had no natural predator who really could control their numbers, so evolution/mother nature/god invented the zombies to do a cleaning swipe...

Well we will never know what exactly happened.

But it is astounding how big a society can grow with the brain standard of a zombie.

Zombie history tells how it was in the beginning..free roaming humans everywhere, billions of them frolicking in the pasture, in cities, in the oceans and the mountains.

Humans really were everywhere and when you wanted a snack you just could hunt one down.
At first eating humans still was a dangerous business because humans were agressive, fiercy creatures and they were very high in numbers, higher than zombies, naturally.

But thanks to evolution and the survival of the species,zombies used their mindless brain for the only thing they cared for...very efficiently..brains.

All that brain eating and the healthy cholesterol and saturated fats they got from their food, seems to have had at least a bit of an impact on the mind of the zombies.
Or it was the couple of scientists that underwent zombification that had something to do with it..who knows, no one..and zombies aren´t really that interested in history..or other stuff.

Just food and stuff..stuff concerning food.


So zombies started to work together in groups, not just as brainless, braineating mass..maybe eating the brains of the zombies to be, had been the problems with the low intelligence...

But then something changed and  zombies started working together, really working together, hunting in packs, using traps and weapons and the internet, luring their prey to dates, to parties, underground discos and such things..


All was well for a while, the zombies could eat well and it seemed some of them gained more brain than others and ...

They needed the brain in the end, because the numbers of humans dwindled.
For some time the zombies helped themselves to the billions of farmed animals, but humans were the most tasty animal, unfortunately...a wild species, not a domestic one...and one with a real bad reproduction rate.


Hunger is quite a driving force, especially for zombies.

And ...factory farming really was an inspiration..so to get enough food, zombies got more intelligent, not by much, mind you.

It was hard on the food driven mind to spare the tasty morsels and not take a bite or two out of them.
Yes, zombies evolved and only turned some people on purpose, the most intelligent of them...they could smell that you know...

And with  the scientists turned zombie, it really made a jump, the evolution of zombie.

Genetical engineering was a human given gift, ironically to engineer humans ..not for their own gain, but for making better humans to feed zombies better.

And there was much work ahead for the zombies.

With all the hard work in the first century of zombiekind, some centuries later the zombies could enjoy the fruits of the hard labour of their forezombies.


Now it was hard for zombies to imagine that it was once really dangerous business to get human meat on the table, or that their ancestors ate like humans..with their face and teeth, ...so uncivilised.

Nowadays it was so easy to get food. Sure you couldn´t walk around all day and moan, you had to work to get that meat, but it was much easier than in the beginnins.

It wasn´t just the lack of brain activity that made it hard for zombies to imagine that humans were once wild, dangerous beasts that killed millions their kind..and billions of their own kind, all that wasted, delicious meat.

Today you just walk into the supermarket and get what you desire...well, zombies still desired brain most, but brain was only a small percentage of a carcass and as such a delicacy.

But a nice rack of rips or a fleshy tight was also nice and everyone was satisfied, there was no hunger, for most.

The most controlled of zombies worked on the human farms, you couldn´t have the staff eating all your breeding material or the unripe offspring, really not..


Zombie scientists hadn´t had a hard time to engineer humans to their liking..and they could eat all the failures..delish.


Because human scientists already had made an effort to decode human gens and what was influenced by which gens, the zombies just had to try and pick a bit before they started to perfect humankind.

Humans turned fertil earlier and earlier..that wasn´t really hard.
They also knocked out some gens concerning the controll of hunger, or the gen that controlled the growth of muscles.
The belgians were the first where they had a stable number of individuals that could be breed with more muscle mass..more muscles meant more meat.

Oh they are real beauties..muscles over muscles, nearly no fat, unfortunally.
Fortunally all that bulging muscles made it hard for the humans to move or all those muscles could have been a danger to zombies.
But those moving mountain of muscles could do barely more than stomp slowly around.
The muscles grew without working the humans out, a big plus because you needed less space to keep them and because the gen for muscles growth control was knocked out, they even needed less food than  the average human to grow.


You know why zombies craved brain so much? Because of the tasty, healthy cholesterol.
Brain is 90% cholesterol, zombies need that...really need that, they crave it.
Unfortunally the muscle mammoths were too lean to be a staple food.

So there came the next breed of humans, the one that was always hungry..luckily the genetic disposition that made them always hungry also made it so, that they needed even less food than the muscle mammoths to grow.
Their body just stored fat en mass and with a little snip there and a bit more here, their bodies were manipulated into producing even more healthy, delicious saturated fat and cholesterol.


For humans that was bad...all the muscles, or that fat and high cholesterol levels took their health down, but that wasn´t a concern, humans barely lived beyond 20 years and that was a real old human, so they thankfully died healthy and young and not suffered from old age and the aliments that came with it.


And they had all the food they could have want..and sunlight, because sunlight was important.
Thankfully humans were a herbivore species, otherwise feeding all the billions of humans would have been a real hassle.


Zombies lowered the breeding age from the average 14 years down to 10.
Multible births were normal. In the beginning they had to harvest egg cells and fertilize them and clone them so they could meet their needs for more humans, but soon they had solved that too.

Sure, there was still cloned meat on the market, but only from cloned offspring that had reproduced.
Cloned humans were too precious to just eat them because they still engineered humans to be better than before.


So now there were the queens, females with modified bodies that carried at least 4 young.
They still belonged to the fat breed of humans, but all the child bearing and raising them took a lot of calories and bodyfat so they were much leaner and could be inseminated succesfully.

Breeding them so early also helped, when they were still leaner.
To get more teets also wasn´t too hard, it was quite easy because it was still in the genetic make up of humans.

The better breeding mares had up to 12 sucklings. Unfortunally they couldn´t get more than 8 teets on a human female, so they arranged some sucklings to other breeding mares with less offspring.


Nursing them as long as possible surely would have been best for the growth of the offspring.
But it also hindered the fertility of the mares.

Luckily male humans also had teets and with a hormon cocktail and some training sucktion by machines, they could milk the males too and wean the sucklings from their mothers, feeding them with the dairy from the males.

Unfortunately most males weren´t good with the sucklings directly taking the milk, so they had to be in a harness and milked and the milk went into a system of pipes and tanks so the sucklings could get milk  from artificial teets in the nursing station.

Meat humans were harvested at the age of 10 years, but the ones who delivered all the tasty fat lived longer and were good dairy humans.
This is how zombies got a taste for dairy and also took on drinking it for the extra cholesterol and such...it was easier to harvest than the meat and satisfied some cravings.

What is good for sucklings, can´t be bad for zombies.

The cholesterol humans were harvested with a maximum of 15 years and started producing dairy at 10.

The ones who weren´t needed for producing young or for feeding them, were slaughtered earlier because their meat was tastier so young.

The muscle  mammoth females were not usefull for breeding unfortunately.
They grew as fast as their male counterpart and all those muscles limited the space for the offspring and also made a cesarian a necessarity. Quite a hassle for one young.

So some muscle females and males were kept as breeding stock, to harvest sperm and eggs and fertilize and split the cell mass to get more embryos.
The others were eaten, only the best stock was kept for their genetic material. At least for a while, until they were beyong their prime at 20.

The fertilised eggs were planted into the breeding mares, they also had been modified enough to even birth the overmuscled, very big offspring without any operation.

But those were not the only humanbreeds.

Believe it or not, some zombies took on pets.
Dwarf humans with and without fur were da bomb..and the most long lived breed..an in the dwarf breed you had different colours..but you also got them with modifications.
Because humans still had the urge to run away or sometimes fight against their owners.
And it made them more happy and healthy to have some parts cut off.
Humans without hands and feet were slower and more docile..and happy, less agressive.


Sure, the scientists had been able to decode the sequence for a more docile behaviour and less agression, but humans were still animals and could only be engineered to a certain level.

With the breeding mares and the smaller offspring even more sucklings could be won from one breeding.
24 had been the highest number until now.

But you also could have the dwarfs  modified, like if you wanted to raise your own meat, or when your pet died you could harvest it...and let´s be fair..a pet that lives too long is boring. Who wants the same pet every day for years?
So most dwarf cross breeds didn´t live longer than their big counterpart and made a nice family zombie-holiday dinner...
Most zombies didn´t want the long lived variety, but some did still because they said they tasted better than their fast grown counterpart.

Funny how a zombie society could evolve, but that was it, evolution.
There was even a vegan zombie movement where they spouted some crap about humans and their intelligence and feelings and the right to be treated well.

It was a quite short lived movement that died out after half a century when all the vegan zombies died off.
Unfortunately, cholesterol was an essential nutrient together with the other good stuff in meat like taurin and B12.
Zombies never evolved to produce their own cholesterol, this is why they were so crazy about brains. They needed it from their outside source.

And so there was never a chance for humans to live a humane life again, other than what zombies deemed humane.

The end?~


Zombiemusik



Something that went through my mind...full moon and such.

Oh before I forget it, I will sort through the blog and tear some stuff down I am no longer satisfied with and recreate it, so don´t you wonder  where the material went.

But if you want some old stuff, just ask me.

Feminists and cows

Feminists dislike prejudices and degrading speech, but they carry it too <-link



Feminists are angry when you compare their plight to the plight of cows...

The reasons are the same why men are angry when you compare them to women or put 'female' attributes onto them.

For sexist cis men it is the worst to be compared to women because they see women as weak, dumb, inferior and below themselves.
No one wants to be taken down from the pedestal they have put themselves up.

To those feminists, cows are the same as women are to sexist cis men.

They think cows are dumb, weak, inferior and below them and can be used for their gain, when in reality cows have an intelligence of their own we as humans have not and can never really 'get', they are wonderfull mothers, cows love their family and will remember every one of them for their whole life.
They will defend their loved ones with their life, they feel pain, they suffer.

They have the fear that "Equating cows to humans is insulting and dehumanizing"
Just like cis sexist men have the fear that "Equating women to men is insulting and dehumanizing."

So why is it insulting to be compared to a cow?

Because like sexist cis men they have the image of someone dumb, inferior, worthless..and they don´t want to be compared with someone who is dumb and worthless in their eyes.

In reality both women and cows are wonderful beeings and as a non-woman or a non-cow we can never really know them in and out, their fears, their pains, their spirit...we can only try to imagine and choose to see the obvious.
Like a cow fleeing from the slaughterhouse, swimming through a river and evading capture for months.
Like a cow breaking out of a dairy farm and walking for days, reaching a farm sanctuary where she births her boy to save him from beeing taken from her.
Like a cow trying to break free from the chain around her neck, crying in panic when her  mother is beaten onto the slaughterhouse truck.

It is obvious they feel the same pains as we do.

Neither are dumb or worthless, they can be wonderful mothers, fiercy defenders, strong willed, strong headed and they are misunderstood, ridiculed, abused.

We humans love  to put 'A dogs love, the good mother cat, the intelligent parrot ' and other attributes on animals and see them as better as the animals we abuse regularly, see them more human like.
Because we need a reason why we care for one and abuse the other, therefor one must be better than the other.

And than there is the dumb sheep, cow, the dirty pig, the stupid bitch(isn´t it strange, once praised for loyality and motherlove and the next moment a stupid bitch? ) when in reality the have just as much love, intelligence and care for their young just like cats, dogs and parrots.


It is insulting to be called a cow(or a bitch), because we love our prejudices, we need something to hate, something to see as worthless and below us.

We see to be called a cow, a bitch, a dog, a sheep as insulting because we want it to be insulting.

WE allow others to be called worthless and this is why WE  feel beeing dehumanized and insulted when compared to THEM.


You give others fuel, power over you when you keep prejudices yourself.

Around 1500 it was quite insulting for men to be compares to women and for white women it was insulting to be compared to non white women...non white women were animals.
Non white humans were as worthless, soulless, stupid and to be abused like animals, they were seen as animals and therefor it was an insult to be compared with a non white woman.


Oh, or beeing called a fag..wow big insult because gay people are dumb, are a danger to little boys, are less human than straight men....or not?

Why is fag an insult, because we want it to be an insult.

Be proud to be gay and you take their fuel away, say.."Yeah I am a fag, so what is wrong with that? I am just as much human as you but I guess I am much less hatefull and prejudiced than you and that is something good" (but I guess that may be too many words for some gayhaters *winkwink*)


Why is cow/bitch an insult?

Not because cows or bitches are dumb or worthless, because they are not, but than even dogs are called dumb and worthless in one breath and in the other breath they are humans best friends...strange much?


Stop seeing others as inferior and worthless, and there is no way to insult you.

Are children dumb and worthless? Than why is beeing childish an insult?

Is it wrong to have feelings, to care for others? Than why is beeing a whiny bitch bad and to man up good?


Do you think cows hurt less than human women, when abused?
Yeah some men may think women have fun beeing raped or it is no big deal..wrong!

When you put your bodypart in an orifice where it doesnt belong and impregnate a female and than take the child away after birth to kill it, is there a difference if a human mother is screaming for her child, or a cow is screaming day and night for her child?

Cows have no human speech, but than there are also human women who have no ability to talk, are they inferior to women who can speak? Some think that and 100years ago many people thought that.

Can we say that cows, dogs or horses suffer less because they have too much hair and not the same abilities we have?

How can we not be sure that a cow or horse also hates it to be stuffed with a human arm, to be impregnated and have the child taken away when normally they stay together as family for their whole life and only part either willingly or through death.


But yes, we can not really compare the life of a human female to a cow.
At least not in most countries.

But just like cows are body-modified against their will, are chained, fenced, raped, impregnated and their children taken away, there are human females who are taken into slavery, are body modified for the comfort of others, have things stuffed into them they do not want, are impregnated and the kids taken either away and sold, or are taking the place of their mothers..or are killed.


And if you think that cows have no problems with having stuffed a human arm down their private parts, you have never worked on a dairy farm.

If they don´t hold still they are chained and forced to take it and if they are no longer usefull they are killed.

Just like in some countries it happens to human females.


I think those alien fantasy horror stories with kidnapped humans that are experimented on and the women who are forcefully impregnated by the aliens  is just a projection of the subconcussioness mind, because  we know it is wrong how we treat and 'dehumanize' other beeings into inferior lifeforms..

...and we fear it will be done to us by some superior race that will use us as they please...because compared to them we are dumb and worthless.

In our fantasy stories about mighty powerfull and intelligent aliens we project our fear that someone will do to us what we do to other lifeforms.


It is not an insult to be called a cow, just like it is not an insult to be called a woman.


But it is mighty insulting  to keep prejudices and degrade other beeings who have done nothing to us.
Especially when the same thing happens to you and you fight against those prejudices and want to be better than the masses of misinformed, abusive people.


Now repeat:

White Women are not dumb.
Coloured women are not dumb.
Disabled women are not dumb
Cows are not dumb.

White women are not worthless.
Coloured women are not worthless.
Disabled women are not worthless.
Cows are not worthless.

White women are not inferior in their feelings.
 Coloured women are not inferior in their feelings.
 Disabled women are not inferior in their feelings.
Cows are not inferior in their feelings.

When you hit white women, it hurts them.
When you hit coloured women, it hurts them.
When you hit disabled women, it hurts them.
When you hit cows, it hurts them.

When you rip away a baby from a white mother, that is cruel.
 When you rip away a baby from a coloured mother, that is cruel.
 When you rip away a baby from a disabled mother, that is cruel.
When you rip away a baby cow from a cow mother, that is cruel.

White mothers love their children.
Coloured mothers love their children.
Disabled mothers love their children.
Cow mothers love their children.

White mothers are fiercely protective of their offspring.
 Coloured mothers are fiercely protective of their offspring.
 Disabled mothers are fiercely protective of their offspring.
Cow mothers are fiercely protective of their offspring.


I am a feminist for all women, not just human ones.

If you allow others to be ridiculed and said to be inferior to someone, you are automatically opening the door for you to be called inferior and be ridiculed.

Don´t put onto others what you do not want to be put onto you.

There is nothing wrong with beeing a woman.
There is nothing wrong with beeing a cow.

It is not an insult to be compared to a woman.
It is not an insult to be called a cow.

Just because cows can not use a computer or speak our language doesn´t mean they are stupid.


It is wrong to shove your arm, d*ck or other bodypart into someone who hasn´t given consent.


Once there was a time where it was unthinkable to say that non-white people have the same feelings and emotions as white people.

We know from history how much those people who spoke up were insulted, ridiculed, hated by those who felt insulted to be compared to an inferior beeing.

Now it is my time to speak up and to be ridiculed by those who cling to their prejudices.

Rape is wrong, no matter the species.
Rape hurts everyone equall.
Prejudices hurt everyone equal.

 Or does any feminist believe that just because you have no bleeding wounds that a woman is less hurt by a rape than a woman who was hit or cut? Or because it was a small d*ck a rape is less of a crime as if a woman was raped by someone with a big d*ck?

Why should a woman feel more or less ashamed because she was more or less hurt or there was more or less of d*ck?

Why should be abuse of a non human female be less bad than the abuse of a human female?

Stop prejudices and making other feeling beeings inferior, dehumanizing is made by prejudices.

I am a dog,
I am a pig,
I am a bitch ,
I am a cow.

I am loyal,
I am intelligent,
I am good with kids,
I am docile when you are nice to me, but I kick your butt when you abuse me.


http://www.vegaresearch.org/chillingham-ch.php

To be called a cow is just as degrading and dehumanizing as to be called a woman-stop prejudices.

                                Feminist for all females

I know that many do not want to understand it, mostly because they have had pounded into them that it is ok to abuse, ridicule other beeings who are different to us and that it is an insult to be compared to them.


But I guess most will rant and rave and scream abuse at me because they know that it is true, that they also abuse and they fear it..they fear to say yes, to see their prejudices and change their thinking.
They fear the light at the end of the tunnel because they fear it might be hellfire instead of en-light-ment.

People hate to be remindend of their own faults and shortcomings and societys false teachings they saw as unwavering truth.

Either you are against all prejudices, or you will be insulted by the truth.


Call me pig, dog or cow..I see it as an compliment.

Womenpic from this site
http://www.changingpeople.co.uk/tag/women-only-groups/

The article bares food for thougt  but why shouldn´t women have their own space, don´t get it.
Everyone wants a space where one can be oneself  and those are advertised also, there is nothing wrong with it. And no, that doesn´t weaken people or a movement of theirs.

Oh goy...

..time flies by when you amuse yourself, or are busy.

Maybe I tell you what I have been up to, maybe not.

Sorry to all who missed me and worried and a big "HAW HAW" to all those who were happy that I wasn´t there.

There is some serious s**t going on at the time in good ol' germany, and I am part of it, more or less.

I think I will take other thematics up into the logic blog  also....I am sure it will p*ss of so many more people royally...

Just some fun....

...and some offending

Check Jesus and Mo out...simply good.


And now up to the offending

I am famous...lol

So I got a message from a friend that now you can find me on google  because some special people are talking about me how I get on their nerves(well we all know you can have nerves and do not need a brain ;)  )


It is amazing how people can be proud about showing off that they don´t posess humanity/emphaty or other important things  that are normally part of a social animal.

But on the other side you could also feel sad for them...and with those peoples, the mayority of the human race, we are all doomed.

And how they love to twist words and don´t seem to be able to use logic or google when it doesn´t fit with their beliefs.

I would give you the link, but I think we all know  already enough of those sad examples of inhumankind..but if you like, google them.

Bet you find them if you want ;)  Have fun.

I really have it with F***book

So my profile was deactivated because of 'security' reasons and I had to prove I am me and to  identify friends..done that...

Than they wanted me to add a phonenumber  so they could send my activation code to my mobile

Uh what...I don´t have a mobile, I never added a mobile phonenumber..dead point. No chance to explain that to anyone...

So my profile was lost to me...I did what thousands of other people do...made a new one...5 minutes with my new profile and just wanted to start adding my old friends I was logged out and got a message that someone reported my profile as fake...

Ahm...FB is acting fast, isn´t it?  Just as hilarious as identifying friends when I had not enough to fill the empty spots for this 'test'(third lost profile,or was it fourth? No, between third and fourth profile that was), or sending me a sms to my non-existing mobile.

If FB would act with all user as they do with me and other animal activists, FB would soon be off the market.

Why don´t they report and warn and subject all the drunks/drug takers and beeing proud about it, animal abusers, pedophiles and hatemongers on FB to that treatment?

Oh I guess ...seems 'normal' people are the odd ones here  and are 'dangerous' to the society of facebookia.

20.5.12-UPDATE about the Evilness of Soytan

Soooytaaaan wants your soul...and brains..

Oh and love this write up...take a look

soy and all that it is about


And I got again into a discussion where I was blamed to be blinded by the pro Soy agenda, hailing Tofu as the holy Mary of health, the sole and only  source of healthy food for asians *eyeroll* but no wonder, when asked where I wrote that, no quote could be given.

Seems  that hate really blinds and makes you see things.

Read this article

I dared to question the wisdom of this research because there was no mentioning if they had taken other brain shrinking stuff into context.

Like meat consumption, drinking alcohol, smoking and so on..

So because I dared to question the article I was said to be a soybean loving, no bad seeing, soy promoter who doesn´t warn others of the evilness of soy...

Oh well, I was amused.

Just to keep it short in some sentences..oh well you know I can not keep it short.



GMO is bad, buy organic..no..GMO is really no laughing matter.

Avoid isolated proteinextracts  and products made from it..go for old style, organic soy products.
If you want to eat tofu and don´t have bad reactions, do it..if you don´t like tofu there is no need to eat it.
There is enough food out there for you to eat, no need for soyproducts if you don´t like them.

Miso, tempeh and fermented tofu are better than soymilk and tofu for you, but that doesn´t mean that organic tofu eaten in resonable ammounts will bring you to hell.

If you solely get your calories from tofu, well..that is not resonable. Putting soy in the same place and ammount as animal products were eaten before is also not reasonable.

Just as with animal foods before, not getting your veggies and fruits, just opting tofu instead of meat and dairy may make you  a bit healthier(organic, non GMO tofu because you no longer get all the hormones, saturated fat and chemicals from animals), but that isn´t really good nutrition.


If you have problems with the thyroid, cabbage and unfermented soy can be a problem for you...avoid both or see how much you can eat without problems.
It is said that algaes eaten normally in the japanese kitchen are the reason why they don´t have problems with low thyroid hormone levels, so maybe you want to eat some kombu broth or crumbled algaes?

About breastcancer, well the research is contraindicating itself...some say the phytohormones are a problem, so better avoid all animal products because they are high in real hormones and other plants with high phytooestrogen levels.

Other studies say that the phytoestrogen of soy is blocking the access for real estrogen, blocking cancer growth..if you feel unsure, don´t eat...simple.

http://www.cancernutrition.com/breast_lecture.htm

I am neither pro Soy nor anti-soy...I just dislike this tofu-racism  that is vomited all over the net where soy /tofu is blamed for all kind of things and research is presented without real footing showen.

So if there is a research showing that non GMO tofu shrinks the brain, with people not eating/smoking/drinking other brain damaging,  shrinking stuff, I will gladly share this research and warn people from consuming tofu.

But until then, tofu is a food..simple..just as grains..and just because some people have celiac disease  I have never seen the same wheat-racism beeing applied to all gluten containing grainproducts  as it is done with tofu.

Vegans want to eat meat, animals just shouldn´t have suffered for it..

The heralds most trolling author...

So vegetarians don't want to eat meat and vegans want to eat meat that doesn't cause suffering to an animal. Hence the desperate, flicking glint in their eye. And hence the attractions of roadkill.

Uh.... desperate flicking glint, attraction of roadkill?

I guess he is mixing it up with the people who scrap roadkill from the side of the highway and turn it into a barbecue and stew...I believe there is even a roadkill cafe?

How is roadkill attractive? Even most animal eaters won´t touch roadkill with  a ten foot pole...and I touch roadkill to burry it, not eat it.

But maybe he is just visualising his mindset on other people and he would like to eat roadkill and gets a sick attraction to dead bodies on the side of the road?

I mean..normal people rather want to burry a dead body than eat it....he isn´t provocative, he is just showing off  his small mindset and..yes I would say, sickness of it.

Whoever gave him the idea that vegans want to eat meat?

All the vegans I spoke with, and also me, find the notion of eating a dead body, muscles, blood..disturbing and sick...just as most animal eaters would find it disturbing to eat a dead human.

Yeah, it would be vegan to find a dead animal somewhere and eat it, it also would be vegan to eat an animal that wants to be eaten and jumps willingly from a cliff or into a knife or hangs itself.

It would also be vegan to eat humans if they died from other causes or wanted to be eaten.

Maybe that is Jeff Corbets dirty little, secret fantasy...he is such an intensive meateater that he would just love to bite into the juice tight of a murdered prostitute(not killed by himself..just by someone else), eating her in a bit different way than he might have done before.

Maybe Jeff Corbet is fearing his own cannibalistic fantasies, so he needs to project them in a bit different way onto a group where even just the notion of animal eating would be disgusting.

In reality, Jeff Corbet might even want to kill someone with his own hands..why I think that?

It is more or less agreed that vegans eating roadkill won't encourage drivers to aim for kangaroos and goannas. Unless, of course, the driver is a vegan.

And there we have nailed it..killing an animal on the purpose to eat it, isn´t vegan..but he is saying it as if that was true..

Psychological seen that shows, that in reality Jeff Corbet maybe has the inner yearning to drive someone over, to kill someone in a way that could be seen as an accident..and than  eat that person instead of calling an ambulance.

It is typical for people with psychological problems and sick tendencies to reflect their own desires onto other people  and twist them around.

Eating roadkill is done by animal eaters, it is not really strange..it is just a bit disgusting, but for other people eating oysters or testicles, that would be also disgusting.

So for himself to relief his potential fantasies, he turns to vegans where the pure notion of eating animals is disgusting, but for the main number of humans it is normal to eat animals.

So psychological seen, he twists his own desires(if he has such desires) into a social accepted way to defend his own mindset....because it is disgusting for vegans, but normal for animaleaters to eat animals, clothing his secret desires into something that disgust a minor group, he himself can feel safe.

Maybe deep down he hopes even, that eating dead humans might someday be just as normal as eating roadkill...dreaming about a future where not the ambulance or police is called, dreaming about a future where his fantasies can come true, where he can   grab the dead human, put it in the back of his car, drive home and have a nice human barbeque.


In reality his article is not about  vegans eating ethically correct roadkill, in reality he shrouded his own fantasies into a social accepted way, savouring his own dream.

That those are his own desires, to be able to aim with his car for a human, kill him by driving him or her over and eating the dead body, does become clear when he implies that vegans would  kill an animal on purpose to eat it, because they have the excuse of it beeing an accident and the animal beeing roadkill.


In his mind, in his fantasy he seems to be the driver in a world where eating humans killed by accident or natural causes, is social accepted. Maybe he is even driving over a colleague or family member in his fantasy, whom doesn´t like and would love to be able to kill them and get away with it.


But because that would be sick and wrong,roadkill and ethical vegans are the perfect way to secure and cloud his desires.

So...if Jeff Corbett has an accident on the road sometimes in the future, there could be the possibility that it was not a real accident.
Maybe he already has some skeletons in his closet...?
Maybe he is watching people on the side of the road whenever he is driving in his car, having this desperate, flickering glint in his eyes, wishing how he could eat human meat once, it beeing ethical...?

We might never know, except if he would really flip and drove over someone and eat him, the carcass later be found somewhere in his basement.

But he can satisfy his desperate craving for ethical, human meat if he gets the chance to make a holiday in the deepest jungle of africa or south america where there could be still some cannibals, where the humans know they might be eaten and it is their way of living.

The thought gets especially irking because his 'provoking' article  and the mindset behind it, isn´t so absurd..maybe he envys them...

Tasty human meat empanadas

I wish him good luck on his cravings  he seems to harbor secretly...and also the people who cross ways with him.

At least, he might even defend his doings, if he ever kills or just eats a human, that he heard gods voice urging him on..and don´t christian people eat the transformed body of Jesus?

He wouldn´t be the first closet-cannibal that first clouds his needs in a social accepted norm and later succumbs to them.

Especially gruesome because his article came up around the same time when christian people killed and ate muslims...did his desires he might harbour boil and threatening to overpower him so he needed a way to controll them?

Eating his own kids-secret desires?

And in August another such case came up

Christian cannibals

We might never know...or maybe we will..depends on it if he has them and can control them.


If he has cannibal tendencies I pity them, those are hard cravings he might have to deal with.
If he has them, I wish him good luck..and a good doc to help him with them.



I don´t say he has cannibalistic tendencies...but psychological seen his article and  the possible notions in there seem a bit alarming.

Especially because he mentions his wife making a casserole  with oysters and pig, especially the pig beeing said to taste the same as human flesh and cannibals calling their human victims long legged pigs

It could also be that he has just some homosexual fantasies and because his social environment would not allow that and see it as horrible, he shrouds it into something that would be seen as horrible in a minority but accepted by the majority of humans...

So instead of him maybe dreaming desperately about some hard man-meat in his mouth he could 'chew' on, he shoves his fantasies on vegans who he says have the desperate glint of wanting some meat in their mouth.

Ridiculous  and desperate if it is so, but no matter if he might have maybe cannibalistic or homosexual tendencies...well ...I really hope if he has some secret yearning, it is that of having  human meat in a sexual way, not a cannibalstic one.

Eat beef because that is american...

..or also, the West wasn´t won on salad and so on...*yawn*

Beef is so american and cowboys and war and ...and..and..

Surprise, the west wasn´t won on beef either, it was  beans.Oh I can hear the angry scream..what beans?


Beans and corn(bread).  Just use a bit of healthy logic.

Cowboys...just imagine cowboys, getting a herd of hundreds of cows together, going for weeks or months through half deserts, bringing the herd to feedlots near the ports because the meat is shipped to europe..

What do you think they ate, a big nice steak every night, killing a cow that is not their own and dumping the rest of the meat?

No, the cook in his wagoon  took beans with him and cornmeal, onions and garlic and coffee.
Everything stuff that could be kept for a long time, sure there was lard and a bit of bacon because that also kept for long, but the most food that lasted a long time, was nutritous and didn´t turn bad was beans.

The cook would throw beans in his kettle to soak them over night or after breakfast which consisted mostly of cowboy coffee and skillet-cornbread...and maybe some beans from the night before.

The beans soaked and were cooked out of the back of the wagon on a small portable fireplace that was feed with dry cow shit, so the cowboys could eat beans when they stopped for the night.

If the boys were lucky the cows stopped during the day for a bit to drink and graze if they found a suitable place and than  they got coffee again, maybe the cook had some leftovers or zwieback, similiar dry and hard crackers for a meal.

But mostly it went on all during the day with a breakfast and a nightmeal.

They couldn´t slaughter a cow, it wasn´t theirs and there was not really the possibility to cook it..howI ask you should they have done that?

The nightmeal was done fast, new beans were made to soak, the water filled up if it wasn´t done in the morning, a fire started for the night.

And how should they have killed the cow?

One of the things most feared was a stampede when the cows got into a frenzy..one cow panicked and hundreds of them started to panic too,running and running...how do you stop a whole cow herd with some horses when they are terrified?

And what terrified them? The smell of blood and the sound of shooting..so how kill a cow?

And what with the rest of the cadaver that would turn bad because of the heat in the matter of hours, you couldn´t preserve the cow, you couldn´t make a steak, you had to make stew...

Cowboys cared for the cows, they didn´t get to eat them, only on special occassions.

It was more likely that one of the boys went out at night, prepared a trap and than they caught a squirrel, a hare, a praeriedog or something similiar and the cook put it to cook with the beans.

No cows..sorry.It was beans, plain and simple beans


Skilleted cornbread was a staple becaus it was cooked in a pan with lid and could be made on the side with the beans, the cast iron pan baking the bread.

Oh and also no bacon and eggs as breakfast..eggs..do you realise they were on the move, where to get fresh eggs and how fast they turned bad?

Don´t think about milking such a beef cow...also the treks were hard enough on the animals so their milk dried up and calfes born during the treck who died might have been the only beef the cowboys saw on their plate.

Also do you know how the housewifes were told in those cookbooks to prepare the beef?

To use a hammer and an icepick or a similiar instrument and make holes through the beef so they could put strings of pig fat through it to cook the meat soft.

And this was the advise for the good! beef...not a larding needle, they first needed to drill or pound holes into the meat.

Oh and steak..yeah that was pounded and slow cooked..the story of the steak under the saddle isn´t so untrue.

The steaks that were fast seared and than eaten..that were pampered young cows for the rich, not the cows that went on a treck..moving makes the meat tough.

You know why they ate the steaks in the saloons rare? Because if cooked through you couldn´t really get through it..but it also could be beef that had been hanged so long and ripened that it was already...softened through the enzymatic processes in there..but they also could catch themselves a food poisoning with it.

That even the beef that ripened on the ships, when shipped to england, was told to be prepared with wood drills so strips of fat could be put through it, should tell you something..and it still was better! beef than what the english housewife could get in england.

But maybe that was just american propaganda of these days...but I guess that was really the case...beef at this time was not something you ate very often. And I doubt those old cooking books lied, why should they?


And as it was jokingly told, the beans helped to keep cojotes and redskins away..you know what they meant with it.


In reality the west was won on beans..and coffee, lots and lots of coffee

Fur is ok as long as it is ethical/from culled animals/you didn´t kill the animal by yourself

What exactly does culling mean?

This picture is a result of culling.

Hunters go out and round up any animals they can find, killing as many as they can get.

Most times that means dozen of hunters with dogs rounding up the wild animals, killing every animal they can shoot, no matter that there might be pregnant ones or mothers with pups.

Culling is a fancy word for mass kill.

Culling is not a mercy kill, culling is not euthanizing an animal that suffers, culling means killing every animal you encounter with any means neccessary....poison, snares, steel traps, shooting it or just clubbing it to death.

Culling is a fancy word for killing to tell the people who buy fur that this animal was not killed/hunted..it was culled because the animals ate too much fish or hares or pheasants which the hunters wanted to kill themselves and not share with the wild predatores.

People make money from the furs...and because they can make money, they will want and make further culls to make more money


Culling wolves, aerial killing

There is no ethical fur, the animals don´t die naturally...


And who can really believe it is ok to wear fur as long as you didn´t kill the animal yourself or it was specifically killed for you?

The animal was killed because someone calculated that  there are people out there who will buy fur and money can be made with it.

An animal was killed on purpose to feed the market, when that fur is bought another animal is killed to fill the empty space the fur has left behind, maybe also killing a second and third because they can and think that those furs will sell also.


You didn´t kill the animal yourself, you paid someone  for it and also paid someone to kill another one for the animal you just purchased

If we would not eat them,the animals would loose all purpose in life and die out

Does anyone really believe those animals see their purpose as beeing breed, mutilated and than slaughtered to be eaten?

"Oh hey I am beeing born, let´s eat and grow and than go to slaughter to be eaten. Because when I am grown I want to be bacon"


So I guess humans are also born and know their purpose in life?

"When I am grown up I wanna slave away in a factory, making the bare minimum and enjoying it to work for a blood sucking corporation, that is my goal and I love it"


No matter which animal..or plant, they are born and strive to  live, to make the best out of their life...children don´t dream about scrubbing toilets, parents wouldn´t want that for their children.

No animal is born for slaughter and no parent wants that for their children.

They are forced into it, struggling against it...it is not their purpose, not their destiny, it is human made brutality.


And about dying out...they are breeds...not a species.

They are breed from a wild animal, if they die out nothing will happen.

The animals don´t care if they die out, they just want to live happily and if they do not have offspring and stop existing..what is wrong with that?

There are wild cows and wild horses, wolfes and pigs...they are what really matters, from them all the thousand different breeds are made, their genpool minimized to sculpt a species.

If the wild ones die out, the  genetic pool is lost..if the domestic die out, no harm done.

There are many wild grazers that will keep the pasture open, doing a better job than farmed animals.

Farmed animals will turn a swampy pasture into mud and a dry savannah into desert...wild grazers don´t.

They are adapted to the land, living with it, taking what they need, not destroying it.


In turn the want of humans to keep domestic animals, helped to extinct the wild ones, farmers killing off wild birds,horses, pigs, cows, kangaroos, buffalos because they didn´t want to share the bit of space, food and water with the wild animals.


In reality farming meant extinction since the beginning of it.

Evil Soytan-beware!

You will land in hell, surely!

Oh this sounds so amusig, the tone reminds me a bit about those middle aged christian priests who tell you, you will land in hell for having sex for fun and double the hell if you dare to be non-heterosexual.

As with many "Evil Soytan" articles, this one has also mixed truth with halftruths and lies because if people see some truth, they will think everything is true.



But as we know, no matter what we say, those old stocked, frigid catholic priests will always believe in Gay-Satan and premarital-sex Satan.
Same as people will always belief that eating animals does a body good and soy is eeeeeevil  no matter what.

To change those cemented minds would require to shatter them, and that is only working with heavy machinery.
Not with logic, not with knowledge...and a shattered mind can not be fixed so let them live in peace.

But for those critical thinkers it may be welcome.

Myth of the myths

1. Soy was only used after people learned to ferment it.And that was ~3000years ago( which funnily would still be claim that soy is used since thousand of years..loooool)

Well, chinese texts praise the soybean as a holy plant, used as food and medicine. The oldest texts of use seem to be 7.000 years old and  nearly 5.000 years back the legendary Emperor Shennong of China proclaimed that five plants were sacred: soybeans, rice, wheat, barley, and millet..

I am not so sure about the wheat, if the mean the same wheat we have nowadays or a similiar plant.
I guess some early variant of the wheat nowadays which is known since 11.000-12.000 years

So all those plants like rice and wheat are grains, why would the soybean be there if not used as food?

Similiar non fermented(but soaked and boiled) soy beans have been used as  "soy milk" since 82 CE and there is evidence of tofu consumption that dates to 220  found on archaeological sites..just like the evidence of noodles and so on have been found on those sites and this is why we know a not so exactly age since when noodles have been made, beer was brewed, wine was made, tofu was made and consumed because residues were found in pots and pans, dried up and so on.

2. Asian people eat only 10 gramms of soy and as a condiment


Those 10 gramms of soy are in reality 10 g of soy protein when scientists calculated how much soy protein asian people ate, which than was used by the Soytan-callers and turned into 10 g soy, not protein.


A bowl of misosoup has already nearly 10 gramms of miso...see what is going on there?

Maybe you believe  someone with a title?

But let us stay with the agricultural side a bit...if you know a bit about farming, especially in the earlier years around the middle ages, you will know that people prepared their foods to be eadible in winter, long months after it was harvested and to preserve it.

Good example is Kimchi, soy beans can be dried and keep very well. Warriors in ancient times have been known to carry soy beans with them, soaking them during their rides on the day and than cooking them for a night meal.

Why should the soy bean as only eadible legume be excluded from this?

Sure, not everyone got soybeans and not in the ammounts that are used nowadays...the best Miso was even only allowed to be used by the emperor and his family and 'friends'.

People always ate green soybeans when the time was right, people dried soy and stored it to use it  when food did not grow as well, legumes were soaked and cooked all over the world...so why not the soybean?

Because of the magical bad stuff in them that also other legumes carry and even grains?

People even ate the residue from making soymilk and tofu..okara, they cooked with it, what wasn´t eaten at once was dried or fermented and used later.

The next point number 3 is true...fermented soy  foods are healthier than non fermented 

Especially the modern use of soy, isolating it with toxic, cancerogenous hexane and in aluminium tanks which leeches aluminium in the food, are a problem. But than again, not the fault of the bean, fault of the humans,same as with GMO..

You can not blame the bean for it, humans are at fault. It could happen with any food and any isolated substances are more or less risky, unhealthy or even dangerous.


Point four-all proteins are complete...a big pet-peeve of vegans and especially also me..all food contain all amino acids.
There is no incomplete protein, that would be like saying that there are incomplete animals living without neccessary organs..like incomplete and complete horses...the incomplete missing a heart.

Every living beeing contains all essential amino acids, soy beans, salad, spirulina and so on...

You do not need to eat soy to get your protein, this is true.

5. Halftruth  of: There is no B12 in fermented (soy) foods

Like I said earlier in the myths of why we need meat...

B12 producing bacterias were once on every surface, eaten with every food and even drunk with beverages and water.

Only bacterias produce B12 and in old style fermented foods that have not been breed with isolated(isolating is not only bad for soy) bacterias, the B12 is in old style, low scale fermented foods.

B12 producing bacterias are not good or fast fermenters, therefor the industry isolated only 1 or 2 bacterias from the mix of hundreds of bacterias that  have been used since thousad of years to ferment foods, from kimchi to fruits, to bread dough, beer to beans.

But the industry wanted a normed product, kicking the B12 producing bacterias out of the mix...again not the fault of the soy or the bacterias. Humans are again at fault.


Number 6 is downright brain-hurting


Soy formula does not contain cholesterol needed for brain growth

Do I really! have to say something to this, do I?
Weston A price foundation I hear you loud and clear.... didn´t know cholesterol was added to infant formula from cow milk because cow milk has very low levels of cholesterol compared to human breastmilk.

But strangely taurin is added to formula for babies because it is essential for babies and cow milk has low levels compared to human breast milk..so why not Cholesterol, why?

But now for soy formula that is to be required?

Oh and those test animals feed a high diet in trypsin. Isolated trypsin from pounds and pounds of soy beans that was force feed to them and injected directly into their body.

Trypsin levels you could not reach even when only eaten cooked, unfermented soy all day for weeks.

Just check the Weston A price Evil Soy sermon and the references they have. The animal research was done with raw soybeans, isolated trypsin, force feed and injected..not even they are allowed to lie..only to hide it itsy-bitsy in their references between dozens of others.

Oh and those megadoses of phytoestrogenes that are 10.000 times like taking the anti-baby pill, really?

So why do babies not lactate and grow boobs?

But strangely baby boys and girls will lactate after birth because of the hormon levels they have gotten from their mother, but not  the thousand times higher levels from soy formula?

Little girls menstruate after birth also, because of mommys hormon levels..why do little girls not menstruate when feed soy formula?

Oh and as long as you are not delivering any evidence why soy would result in a bigger need of vitamin D in the diet I do not take you seriously!

There is real oestrogen and pregnancy hormones in cow milk and high doses of those hormones in animal flesh.


Most babies are feed dairy based formula, not soy..because soy is more pricey and is not given out by the welfare on which many women rely.


Really, soy is the culprit?


Number 7, soy does steal calcium and vitamin D...references, ressources..anything?

Oh..no..this article has none!  If there was written the earth is flat like a pancake it wouldn´t be taken for reality, especially without references..give me some, 'wood' you please?


Number 8 halftruth... true, modern isolated and especially GMO soy will not protect against cancer or in turn will  even raise it...but old style will  protect you and not be harmfull to you.

Number 9, again a halftruth.

True is that cholesterol is not the lone factor for heart diseases and eating soy will not protect you when you eat a modern SAD diet, smoke, drink alcohol and otherwise ruin your health(unprotected sex, doing drugs and so on)

Soy is not Jesus, it will not raise the dead, be responsible...soy beans are not magic, they are food.


Number 10 halftruth  and lies  (oh no and there is even more than 10, my poor intellect)

It has been disproven in studies that soy causes growth of estrogen induced breast cancer, but that  will not deter the followers of the Evil Soytan theory.

In some rare cases the minimalist ammount of estrogen that phytoestrogen mimics when the woman had a full hysterectomy to stop the bodily production of oestrogen, than even the small estrogen like properies of soy can be problematic.

But those women really would get bad problems when eating meat or drinking dairy, so if those are not avoided and soy is eaten, why is the soy blamed?

Phytoestrogen is much weaker than real one, this is why it protects from estrogen induced cancer by blocking the receptors for real estrogen.

Animal foods have full blown estrogen, dairy has also pregnancy hormones..so what is more likely to agitate estrogen induced cancer growth?


Number 11, lie


One study! did say that high tofu consumption causes alzheimer, but did they take other factors into account?


In reality it was bad nutrition

The study suggests that those elderly people had not enough b-vitamins like folate in their diet, which fermented products like tempeh have.

Elderly have problems with digestion and chewing,  they loose their sense of taste and smell and choose soft food, not eating  especially b-vitamin rich, harder to chew and digest foods.

B-vitamins are neccessary for good function of the brain and nerves and  mentally ill patients who have been feed brewers yeast, got better. Those studies about mental health and b-vitamins have been made in the early times of gathering the knowledge of vitamins.

Chickens and doves feed with polished rice got ill, unpolished healed them from 'alzheimer/dementia/insanity'.

Than patiens in mental hospitals were feed foods concentrated high in B-vitamins, all got better and many were even healed completly because in those times the poor had also poor food sources and when they developed mental problems they were showed in those institutions with just as bad food.


And guess what asian people eat mostly...unpolished or polished rice?  This is why in Japan cities the soba noodles houses sprung up because buckwheat is rich in b-vitamins and people were told to eat those for good mental health.

Japanese medieval doctors knew that eating the polished rice, which was food for the rich, resulted in mental problems, so they recommended soba noodles which got really popular and are still..


Beware his Holyness, the Great Noodle! Prayse his doughie goodness!

All Hail the Great Noodle!

RAMEN!

Oh and something else interesting...



Number 12...Oh I so have no interest to do that..maybe later

The same  FDA who says that artificial sweeteners are fine and stevia is bad?

Give me a break, my brain would thank you...and I did say something about soy isolates already so please use your brain instead of abusing mine with this  ...stuff


Number13-soy makes infertil




Oh boy, if not for our saviour the Great Soytan, we would all the overrun with overfertil, baby pooping farm animals that fertilise each other through the wind and breed like cockroaches.


If we didn´t feed 90% of all harvested non fermented GMO soytan to animals we all would be screwed.


GIVE ME A DAMN BREAK AND USE YOUR BRAIN!


Oh...guess that won´t work, the zombies already ate it, didn´t they?

Yeah GMO and modern soy usage is bad, but don´t throw all soy in the same piss-pot.

What a shame that soy doesn´t feminize boys and makes them grow boobs, all the transgender females would be so overjoyed..but guess what, they still have to swallow oestrogen and other female hormones to grow them boobs.

And all those countries where the use of the pill is not allowed, those women would be surely happy to be able to eat soy and not need to pop out baby after baby...looks like if that works?



Oh but thank His Noodliness, we came to an end...only one blasphemy left

Myth: Soy beans are good for the environment.

Truth: Most soy beans grown in the US are genetically engineered to allow farmers to use large amounts of herbicides.

GMO-not fault of the soy, just as soy beeing grown by humans to be feed 90%-wise to farm animals instead of using traditonally.

Normal soy beans are good for the environment, much better than the breeding and abuse of farm animals, just as soy naturally grown has a high resistance against pests and doesn´t need chemicals to grow and will fertilize the ground.

Not the fault of the beans if humans are so damn stupid and abusive  and think they need to dump tons of poison on the fields instead of growing it naturally on healthy soil which keeps the plants resistant and nutrient rich.


So what do we learn from this?

If humans didn´t f*ck up so much, soy would be a food like any other..no evil-infertility-boys feminizing-boobycancerism-environment wannabe destruction here to see, only stupid humans and bad press to promote bones, flesh, brains and titty juice.


But I guess everyone, including vegans, needs some evil to fight against, even if they are just windmills instead of giants and would use ressources from a page that promotes stoneage-carnage-brain eating, raw liver to infants feeding-carnism.

Oh you are soooo funny *yawn*

Taco del Mare advertising with  "Vegans beware, we now have steak"

Do you want a cookie? I mean, if there was a prize for dumb, overused, braindead jokes you would have won it, are you proud of yourself?

This would be like a whore advertising herself/himself by saying  s/he has a new STD that everyone knows about, but s/he thinks is great news and brings her/him more costumers.

Ahm yeah...it is so intelligent to affront and loose costumers when you need the money...

Who is doing your marketing? Dumb and Dumber?

At least when you want to loose costumers do it in a new, brilliant way like...

"Hey did you know, all our salads are made with bonebroth concentrate in the dressing"

or

"Hey our veggieburgers have ground up baby cow brain in them"

or maybe...

"Beware doglovers! We love Vick, try our new quarter dog pounder"

what about

"Hey mommies to be, beware! We now have abortion pills-roulette..you may get some crushed in your meal or you won´t. Join  the fun, try your luck"

"Hey everyone who desperately wants children, try our new fetus tempura"

That would be real new, innovative ways to scare away costumers.

Del Mare, if you are so desperate to scare people away from your restaurants I give those slogans to you for free, have fun.

We need to eat them because...

Some similiar arguments why we would need to eat animals...

"But we need to eat the cows, because they are causing global warming. If we don't eat them, we'll be overrun with them."

Same as :    Meat eaters get rid of methane-producing animals while vegetarians destroy oxygen-producing plants.".....therefore meat-eating is better for the environment than vegetarianism.

Oh how did the earth survive before selfless humans conquered the food chain and fought the big bad, reurgurating animals that burp and fart methan? The world surely would be nonexistent now.

Well, we breed them in unnatural number, don´t eat them, don´t breed them, no overrunning and methane burping and farting.

Animals also need to eat plants to grow...16 pound grains for one pound beef and how much grass do you think dies through pasture raised cows...you evil plant killer!

"If you don't eat them, they die for nothing!"

So you think if no one ate animals, we still would breed 56.000.000.000  animals each year for food and just kill and dump them?

 Maybe those people are just not familiar with the principle of action and reaction?

Buy something, more is produced. Buy nothing, nothing is produced.

"Its impossible to live on native 'insert country' plants"

So we are all living in greenland and the north- and south pole?
And you want to eat only plants that are native to your country?

Ok where are you from?

England, germany, asia? Please drop all the potatoes,tomatoes, sweet pepper, hot pepper, sunflowers, cotton, linnen, cabbage, kale, wheat, oats, beans, corn, apples, bananas, pineapple...

Most of our domestic plants we grow are from all over the planet and most are from africa and america..some are also from the area of arabia/turkey.

So why only native plants, why not plants that grow there?

And you want only native plants, what about native animals? 


Amerika, please drop the horses, cows, sheeps, goats, chicken, geese, ducks and pigs that you are farming, they are all invaders from europe.

The ten comandments of Cooperism

1. Logic rules
2.What would Dr.Sheldon Cooper do?
3.Whenever you do the Cooper because you encountered something ridicolous, make this expression.It helps greatly to channel the Cooper.

4. Always keep in mind to take  it dead-serious, no matter how stupid it sounds to you what others say. Remember, they take it serious, do so also....the dark humorous touch comes automatically.
5.Ingraine those quotes into your thinking to keep the Cooper with you.

6. Sarcasm doesn´t mean to get angry, keep your cool and go with the flow so it will amuse you.

7. The angrier they scream at you, the calmer be yourself, it will be so entertaining...

8.Say insane things, but say them absolutely seriously.

Here is an example for you.

9.If you feel anger boiling up and can not get to the calm of the Cooper, get the crazies of the Cooper.

At least if you can not be logical,scare them.

10.You are not better than others, you are not an ueber-human, you are humane, you make mistakes, you have shitty days, the world may look like shit sometimes...deal with it.

Drink some tea, eat some chocolat, drink some Engery drink, get boners with yourself or your partner, scream, jump around like Rumpelstilzchen...do whatever is needed to get back to Cooper, even if it means to totally loose it.

You can just pick it out...

"That is a vegetable stew/soup/salad, just pick out the meat/bacon bits/bone"

Oh really, so how can I pick out the cell liquid, blood residue and everything else that  is infused into the cooking liquid?

Show me your magic trick, maybe next time I can turn urine into pure water again?

Question, what would you do when there would be maggots in your steak  or stew  and the waiter tells you.. "Oh the steak/stew/salad is fine, just pick them out"

Or like the couple who bought some take home and in the stew was a cooked, partly dissolved rodent.
The court didn´t say "Hey just pick it out, the stew is sterile and you will not get ill, don´t be so sensitive"

How about some extra protein in your bread.. don´t worry, it was sterilized during baking.

The rodent was a nutritious meat, cooked and fully save to eat, but the people didn´t like the rodent, so they were compensated.


If you wouldn´t  stay cool at a rodent, snail, maggots or whatever in your food and just pick it out and eat the food, don´t expect others to just pick out something out of the food and eat it the food that had something disgusting in it.


Not even people in prison have to eat meat they find disgusting, so why should we?

Or maybe you would just eat it?

Becoming X is missing out on Y

If you have more ideas..just hit me up, you know where.

This would imply:

or how about the straight female version?

or more genderneutral

Again for the ladies

And one of my favorites (I especially like the shiny red)

8 options, 4 times wrong

This shit is better than that shit...


Tuna, salmon, turkey, chicken...mh yeah let´s exchange hormon infused, GMO nourished, BSE fueled muscle flesh for the flesh of an endangered species full of petrochemicals and heavy metal..or...some other endangered animal, mostly massbreed in farms, massfeed antibiotics and animal meal with chicken shit.

Yeah chicken shit is allowed as chep 'protein' source for turning it into food for pigs and farmed fish..and they also get GMO soy and other waste that you wouldn´t normally touch with a ten foot pole..you are what you eat, aren´t you?


....or how about a frankenstein creation that breaks down under its own bodyweight, massfeed antibiotics, breathing ammonia-air, never seeing daylight,mutilated shortly after birth, pushed with hormones and arsen...sounds all so much better than cow.

Wutwut...is there healthy in the title? Four of those options are not healthy.


Some may argue to get pasture/organic/grass feed animals..but how many really do and just use it as an argument "We could and it is so much healthier than factory farmed stuff" ?

To feed america with grass feed beef 80% of the land mass used for farming would be needed to be turned into pasture for cows to graze on.

That does leave 20% of fertil land mass for pigs, poultry and for growing plants as human food...does that sound possible?

Milk is life, we need milk

" You cannot reject milk from the human society. As soon as there is a child born, milk immediately required. Old man, milk is life. Diseased person, milk is life. Invalid, milk is life. So therefore Krishna is teaching by His practical demonstration how He loves this innocent animal, cow. " 

Boobjuce from animals is tasty, let´s suckle

1. No one is rejecting milk in general


Mice drink from mice, chimps drink from chimps, lions drink from lions.

You also do not see a grown up lion suckle on his mommies titties when he is a full grown pasha, already having his own kids.  His momma would quite bash him if he tried to suck on her  titties.

But strangely you see full grown man sucking down breastmilk..not from their mothers but from an animal.

Something wrong here?  How about a nice, cold glass of dog milk?  Or do you prefer gorilla milk,no?

Oh I have something quite luxurious..mice milk, a little cuppa, just enough to cream up your coffee..10.000 dollar.

Did you know that newborn humans would die if feed with cow milk? Sounds very much lifely, not.

And why is that? Maybe because a cow is grown up in 2 years and weighs nearly a ton while a human needs 18 years to grow up and hopefully does not reach half a ton and more?

Same with cats..kittens die when feed on cow milk..every species needs other breastmilk, specially made for this species.

Human breastmilk is life for human babies, cow breastmilk is life for calves but means death for human infants.

It has the wrong kind of protein, too big and complex for humans, too little fat with the wrong fatty acids and too much protein for a human infant, also wrong ammount of minerals and lacking taurin which is essential for human babies but not for cows.

So does milk cure old age, or illness, or disabled persons?

Chuck that milk and hooray, no cancer, gulp down breastmilk and the blind can see?

How about drinking breastmilk and gone is your homosexuality..naw..nonsense...bullshit, or should I say...cowshit?

Ohoh...Krishna demonstrates how he loves innocent cows..bestiality to boot or what?

Yeah our society loves cows so much that we dehorn them with acid or red hot iron pokers, we take away their newborn babies and shoot them in the head or slaughter them to use their stomach for cheesemaking.

We love cows so much we inject them with hormones to produce so much milk that their udder drags on the ground and their joints swell to the size of oranges because the extra weight causes inflammation.

We love cows so much that we castrate the males without painkillers or even saw off the horn...full of nerves and blood vessels..

We love cows so much that we dump them for slaughter as soon as they are sucked dry.


This is the kind of love that drinking milk will force on those innocent mothers...did Krishna really mean that?


Cow milk is essential to built up the brain and finer thinking?

Seems more like milk is hindering normal brain built and activity, because  people belief cows give their milk willingly to humans, are omfortable with getting their newborns taken and also beeing mutilated and taken to slaughter when broken down.



If milk drinking would built the brain and finer thinking, america would be the land of sophisticated Einsteins  and the major contributor to world peace...


If you really love the innocent creatures that nursed Krishna, than don´t steal their milk and babies from them, let them live in peace

Dirty milk     Dairy steals grains from the poor

Dairy industry means eaxactly that..industry...abuse, no lucky cows on pasture, eating greens, frolicking with their babies